Skip to main content

Is the Declining Birth Rate a Problem?

There are so many things to worry about these days it’s hard to keep track of them all. We have political drama, wars, health problems, finances, and many other concerns in our society. Something I have seen pop up a few times now is a concern over the declining birth rate in our country and others. While it may not be on a lot of people’s radar, it is an issue that causes some division among different groups. Some big names like Elon Musk are part of a “pronatalist” movement and believe we are heading towards a crisis, which will be discussed further, because of the birth rate and need to start having more kids to avoid that crisis in the future. Politics aside, Elon Musk has some influence in the world, so people will listen to that and could become worried. There are others that would argue that the declining birth rate might actually be a good thing. They express concern over strained resources and the negative impact on the earth that people have. The topic can be a little confusing when you consider that our population is growing and expected to climb to ten billion people globally in the next few decades! So it can sound contradictory to say that we’re growing in one way but not in another. The reason why, is that life expectancy has gone up due to modern medicine and technology. People are getting older and living longer while less children are being born, which could lead to an unbalanced population of retirees that would be relying on systems that are funded by tax paying workers and crash the economy. That’s the crisis…or is it?

“We all need to have more kids!” That’s what you might start to think if you heed the warnings of Elon Musk, Vice President J.D. Vance, and others that are urging people to have more children and even offering financial incentives for having more kids, like tax credits. Why are they saying that? The birth rate has in fact slowed down in recent history, even dropping below the replacement-level fertility rate, which means we aren’t having enough kids to maintain our population in this country. In Jay Pfeifer’s article, “No Easy Fix for Low U.S. Birth Rate, Economics Professor Says.”, she writes, “The United States needs more babies. Recent data shows the birth rate in the U.S. sits at 1.6 babies per woman over their lifetime, significantly less than the 2.1 births needed to maintain a country’s population.” The actual cause of the decline in births is hard to determine. It could be because birth control is more readily available these days, or even the cost associated with childbirth and raising one to adulthood. According to Mike Walden’s article; “You Decide: Should We Worry about the Declining Birth Rate?”, he points out, “The federal government annually estimates the cost of raising a child to age 17, and the current amount is $233,000.”

It's well known that due to modern technology and advanced medical care, people are living longer. At the same time, less children are being born. So the concern from people like Elon Musk is that if we don’t have more kids, our economy will eventually hit a point where it collapses due to a lack of working age people, and an excess of retirement age people that are dependent on tax funded systems and programs such as Social Security and Medicare. Musk has even claimed that it’s a bigger problem for humanity than climate change. While that may be an extreme take on it, he’s not the only one who feels that it’s going to be a problem. “If people aren't choosing to have children and those children aren't then growing up to be healthy, economically self-sufficient individuals, then the whole economy kind of crumbles” (Siobhan O’Keefe qtd. by Jay Pfeifer). 

There are also people out there that believe we don’t need to worry about having more kids. They acknowledge that there’s less kids being born, but don’t feel a sense of urgency about the matter. There are even some points being made that show the silver lining in fewer births. If there’s incentives for having kids, is there some incentive not to? One of these potentially positive side effects of fewer births that’s brought up is the quality of life for smaller families. Everything is getting more expensive. So having one child instead of two, or two instead of three, means that parents would have more resources like time and money to spend on that smaller family. Nater claims, “Being able to allocate more resources and attention per child generally means kids grow up happier, healthier, and better prepared for the future.” 

Some also point out the impact that an increasing population has on resources in a society and on the earth itself. More people in the world means we need more food, power, medical care, transportation, etc. In her article “World Population Day: Five Reasons to Stop Panicking over Low Birth Rates” Olivia Nater writes, “Reduced population pressure also means less competition for jobs, cheaper housing, and less strain on social services and public infrastructure. The combination of all these factors leads to thriving societies”. A growing population also means more pollution, waste, and the need to build more shelters which can lead to diminishing natural habitats. So if they population stabilizes, some people see that as giving the earth a bit of a break. “Our impact on the planet is a product of how many of us there are and how much each of us consumes. Population growth is a significant root driver of climate change, biodiversity loss, resource depletion and pollution.”(Nater).

There is one common factor in this conversation, and that is the declining birth rate, which is a factual statistic and not up for debate. It’s how you interpret that information that might get you into a debate. Is it going to doom us? Or should we embrace it because of the potential positive side effects? It seems that whether you’re worried about it or not, it is something that requires some thinking. We seem to be headed towards the afore mentioned age gap no matter what. One side says have more kids now, one side says don’t panic, just adapt. It seems like there is some valid reasoning on both sides, and also some middle ground. Both sides have their concerns and both offer solutions. The way we currently operate as a society at least in the United States, is an economy based on growth. If we aren’t going to sustain or increase that growth, we’ll need to adapt. If the social programs that are in place now aren’t going to work in fifty years, we need to either change something now to get ready for it, or at least have a plan to change it the future. Something important to remember is that a society can be affected by lower birth rates, but can also be supplemented by immigration which allows working age adults into a country to hopefully contribute and counteract that birth rate issue.

Either way it’s a situation to keep an eye on, while not necessarily an urgent one, and will require innovative thinking. Things have changed in the last century that have led to a lower birth rate. Things could change again soon that might change that trend. Either way the birth rate issue isn’t one that will doom us all tomorrow. However, if we are going to be a successful society and species, perhaps we should look at these things not as a pending crisis, but a future problem that needs to be addressed today. Proper planning regarding pretty much anything, but in this case the birth rate, is necessary and the right thing to do for current and future generations.



Works Cited

Pfeifer, Jay. “No Easy Fix for Low U.S. Birth Rate, Economics Professor Says.” Davidson, 9 June 2025, www.davidson.edu/news/2025/06/09/no-easy-fix-low-us-birth-rate-economics-professor-says. Accessed 1 July 2025.

Nater, Olivia. “World Population Day: Five Reasons to Stop Panicking over Low Birth Rates.” Population Connection, 7 July 2023, populationconnection.org/blog/world-population-day-five-reasons-to-stop-panicking-over-low-birth-rates/. Accessed 1 July 2025.

Walden, Mike. “You Decide: Should We Worry about the Declining Birth Rate? - College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.” College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 14 June 2024, cals.ncsu.edu/news/you-decide-should-we-worry-about-the-declining-birth-rate/. Accessed 1 July 2025.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to Issue #1

  Welcome to  Intersections ! For our first issue, we will be providing side-by-side reviews on a variety of topics, from movies, to restaurants, to products, and everything in between. We hope you enjoy our magazine! Matt Montoya Editor in Chief                                                                       Photo by Thought Catalog on Unsplash

Should College Be Free?

Jacob Gutierrez  English 102 Mr. Montoya  11 August 2025  Should College Be Free?  College is something many people do in life and can be a fun school experience, however college comes with a cost. From text books, to dorms, to tuition, college is pretty expensive, which begs the question, should college be free?  The average college student spends $20,000 - 60,000 on college tuition depending on the degree and college, additionally the college plays a big factor depending if it's a 2 year or 4 year college. Another factor is if the college is an out of state situation and public or private. Public colleges that are 2 years are usually community colleges such as Columbia Basin College, which costs an average of $7,000 per year. Now for a 4 year public college like Eastern Washington University, the tuition is around $9,000 per year. Notice that I said per year, and not in total, this is where the question “should college be free?” comes into play. Most student...

A Season-By-Season Analysis of Squid Game

   M ost  of us sit down at night, grab our favorite snacks, and watch an interesting show on Netflix or on our favorite streaming platform. Netflix is a streaming platform most of us are familiar with that has many big shows that are interesting to watch.  Squid Game  is a Korean Netflix show that gained lots of popularity here in the U.S., and lots of viewers have been waiting for the final season to come out. And to know what happens with all the show in general. All 3 final seasons are out, and it has been talked about on many different social media platforms. Today we'll be comparing the acting, symbolism, and interesting aspects of the drama of all 3 seasons. Due to each one having different aspects to them and its episodes.  Image used by freestocks on Unsplash During season one we are introduced to the protagonist Seong Gi-hun and his story, him being in financial debt and having a daughter he doesn't have custody of due to his hardships. Shows us h...